Search for: All records

Abstract Embedding a collective of tumor cells, i.e. a tumor spheroid, in a fibrous environment, such as a collagen network, provides an essentialin vitroplatform to investigate the biophysical mechanisms of tumor invasion. To predict new mechanisms, we develop a three-dimensional computational model of an embedded spheroid using a vertex model, with cells represented as deformable polyhedrons, mechanically coupled to a fiber network via active linker springs. As the linker springs actively contract, the fiber network remodels. As we tune the rheology of the spheroid and the fiber network stiffness, we find that both factors affect the remodeling of the fiber network with fluid-like spheroids densifying and radially realigning the fiber network more on average than solid-like spheroids but only for a range of intermediate fiber network stiffnesses. Our predictions are supported by experimental studies comparing non-tumorigenic MCF10A spheroids and malignant MDA-MB-231 spheroids embedded in collagen networks. The spheroid rheology-dependent effects are the result of cellular motility generating spheroid shape fluctuations. These shape fluctuations lead to emergent feedback between the spheroid and the fiber network to further remodel the fiber network. This emergent feedback occurs only at intermediate fiber network stiffness since at low fiber network stiffness, the mechanical response of the coupled system is dominated by the spheroid and for high fiber network stiffness, the mechanical response is dominated by the fiber network. We are therefore able to quantify the regime of optimal spheroid-fiber network mechanical reciprocity. Our results uncover intricate morphological-mechanical interplay between an embedded spheroid and its surrounding fiber network with both spheroid contractile strengthandspheroid shape fluctuations playing important roles in the pre-invasion stages of tumor invasion. 

The central hypothesis of the genotype–phenotype relationship is that the phenotype of a developing organism (i.e., its set of observable attributes) depends on its genome and the environment. However, as we learn more about the genetics and biochemistry of living systems, our understanding does not fully extend to the complex multiscale nature of how cells move, interact, and organize; this gap in understanding is referred to as the genotype-to-phenotype problem. The physics of soft matter sets the background on which living organisms evolved, and the cell environment is a strong determinant of cell phenotype. This inevitably leads to challenges as the full function of many genes, and the diversity of cellular behaviors cannot be assessed without wide screens of environmental conditions. Cellular mechanobiology is an emerging field that provides methodologies to understand how cells integrate chemical and physical environmental stress and signals, and how they are transduced to control cell function. Biofilm forming bacteria represent an attractive model because they are fast growing, genetically malleable and can display sophisticated self-organizing developmental behaviors similar to those found in higher organisms. Here, we propose mechanobiology as a new area of study in prokaryotic systems and describe its potential for unveiling new links between an organism's genome and phenome. 

Abstract The ability of bacteria to colonize and grow on different surfaces is an essential process for biofilm development. Here, we report the use of synthetic hydrogels with tunable stiffness and porosity to assess physical effects of the substrate on biofilm development. Using time-lapse microscopy to track the growth of expanding Serratia marcescens colonies, we find that biofilm colony growth can increase with increasing substrate stiffness, unlike what is found on traditional agar substrates. Using traction force microscopy-based techniques, we find that biofilms exert transient stresses correlated over length scales much larger than a single bacterium, and that the magnitude of these forces also increases with increasing substrate stiffness. Our results are consistent with a model of biofilm development in which the interplay between osmotic pressure arising from the biofilm and the poroelastic response of the underlying substrate controls biofilm growth and morphology.